Exercise Caution in Criticizing Judiciary and State Institutions – Former President Kufuor
Former President John Agyekum Kufuor has advised Ghanaians to approach criticisms of the Supreme Court and other key state institutions with caution and respect. He emphasized the need for measured discourse to preserve the dignity and integrity of these democratic bodies.
His comments follow a controversial Supreme Court ruling that deemed Speaker Alban Bagbin’s declaration of four parliamentary seats as vacant unconstitutional. The decision has sparked heated debates, with sharply divided opinions across political and social circles.
Speaking to the media on Sunday, November 17, Mr. Kufuor underscored the critical role these institutions play in safeguarding Ghana’s democracy. He urged the public to uphold respect for these bodies, even when disagreements arise.
“While it is natural to have differing views on judicial decisions, maintaining a respectful tone is crucial,” the former President stated. “The strength of our democracy depends on the public’s continued trust in these institutions, even amid contentious rulings.”
He reiterated the principle of checks and balances within governance, highlighting the constitutional mandate that binds all state institutions.
“In the Fourth Republic, the constitution is supreme, and it grants the Supreme Court interpretative authority. Once a ruling is delivered, it must be respected. However, the court does not go out looking for cases; individuals bring matters before it,” he explained.
Mr. Kufuor acknowledged that constructive critique is essential for accountability but urged citizens to exercise thoughtfulness to avoid undermining the very institutions designed to uphold Ghana’s democratic values.
“We may belong to different arms of government, but if one isn’t performing well, it is important to raise concerns to prevent excesses. Even so, I encourage caution and balance in how criticisms are expressed,” he added.
The former President’s remarks come at a time when tensions surrounding judicial decisions are testing the resilience of Ghana’s democratic framework.
